TxDOT released their Community Impacts Assessment in two parts:
Councilmember Karla Cisneros sent a letter in response:
"As it currently stands, the negatives of the NHHIP outweigh the positives for residents and property owners in District H." See more, including videos on District H's I-45 page.
Councilmember Letitia Plummer sent a letter in response:
"The NHHIP is a statement of values and an investment in a particular vision for the future of Houston—a future that, in my opinion, is antagonistic to the vision we at the City are working to create."
Harris County Precinct 2 Commissioner Adrian Garcia sent a letter in response:
"[Give] the region the option to start building the infrastructure needed to incentivize multi-modal transportation, rather than continuing dependency on single occupancy vehicles."
The Citizens' Transportation Coalition (CTC) sent a letter in response:
"We do not see that mitigation of community impacts is impossible for Segments 1 and 2, but it will be costly... Our conclusion is that Segment 3 should not be built at this time."
The Houston Parks Board (HPB) sent a letter in response:
"With TxDOT’s continuing failure to recognize relevant impacts to parks and open space under NEPA and Section 4(f) of the Federal Transportation Law, Houston Parks Board continues to have serious concerns about the proposed plans for NHHIP and the integrity of the process."
The White Oak Bayou Association (WOBA) sent a letter in response:
"We are concerned about a number of potentially significant cumulative environmental impacts associated with this project, which we believe are not being adequately addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement process in accordance with Federal regulations cited therein"
Finally, Air Alliance Houston (AAH) with 12 other signatory organizations has sent a letter in response:
"Rather than using this project or the environmental impact statement process to right past wrongs or provide for infrastructure in line with that requested in various Livable Center studies or other community focused plans, TxDOT has concluded that the selected alternative is the only alternative and has begun investing dollars into mitigation.
"NEPA is not meant to simply be a report—but a study to influence and provide guidance to decisionmakers prior to them making the decision. These reports demonstrate that TxDOT has failed in meeting NEPA’s mandate to propose alternatives with less impacts for decision makers to consider."
The City of Houston's NHHIP Facilitation Group presented alternate designs and stated their intention to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with TxDOT.
2019-12-19 NHHIP Segments 1 & 2 Facilitation Group Mtg 7 - Houston Public Works and Huitt-Zollars (pdf)
DownloadA memorandum by Harris County Flood Control District addresses:
A memorandum by Harris County Engineering Department addresses:
Before the November 2019 elections, we held a candidate forum.
TxDOT released three revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) reports in February 2019.
These complement the six DEIS reports that TxDOT released in June 2018.
TxDOT has since scrubbed these DEIS reports from their website, but they are available in archive.
Below are responses from LINK Houston, CSTI acoustics, and Houston Parks Board, plus our updated Impacts And Solutions Action Plan.
TxDOT released six revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) reports in June 2018.
TxDOT has since scrubbed these DEIS reports from their website, but they are available in archive.
In our attorney's response, we "object to the process adopted by TxDOT" of releasing a partial DEIS because it violates Federal Highway Administration regulations.
With the letter, we attached exhibits by Air Alliance Houston, Lower Brazos Riverwatch, our coalition, and Huitt-Zollars engineers.
2018-04-25 Mayor's Task Force presentation (pdf)
DownloadTxDOT released their April 2017 DEIS in several documents.
Below are responses to that report from elected officials, our coalition, our attorney, Houston Parks Board, and Mayor Turner.